Here’s what changed:  

Before Addis, certifications were buried inside audit records. There was no direct link between a raw material and the certificate proving it was sustainably sourced. Teams were manually chasing paperwork, spec techs were reviewing hundreds of legacy documents by hand, and critical gaps, like a supplier certified for segregated RSPO but a spec that said mass balance, were completely invisible.  

Now? Every certificate is digitally linked to the raw material spec it covers. Validation rules fire in real time. Discrepancies surface at the moment of specification build, not months later in an audit.  

The business impact:  

• 1000’s of certificates digitally linked, live and auto-renewing  

• Global certifications now actively verified and traceable   

• Legacy spec errors that had gone undetected for years — found and fixed   

• The RFA licence requirement eliminated entirely as a process by-product   

• Supplier onboarding described as “seamless” by teams across the business – supply chain change management another of our USPs.  

But here’s what we’re most proud of:  

This isn’t just an efficiency story. Every time a shopper picks up a product with an RSPO, Rainforest Alliance, or sustainability certification on the label, there’s now a verified, digital chain of evidence behind that claim. Not a filing cabinet. Not a manual check. A system that proves it.  

That’s what assurance at scale actually looks like. And that’s what we build.  

We’re now scaling this across other commodities like seafood because if it works for eggs, palm oil and cocoa at this scale, it works everywhere.  

To every supplier, specification technology, sustainability lead, and procurement professional who was part of this journey, thank you. You proved that when the right technology meets the right team, you don’t just manage compliance. You transform it.  

All imbedded with AI and in production – not just a demo.  

“It’s been really positive. We’ve never had the opportunity to scrutinise and validate at this level before, it’s been an awesome exercise.”   

Interested in what this could look like for your supply chain? Let’s talk.  

The call provides a voice for industry stakeholders to have their say on improving the front-of-pack interpretive labelling tool. The proposal seeks to review and strengthen aspects of the current voluntary framework, which has now been in the market for more than a decade.  

The latest submission proposal will have several areas for potential refinement, including whether the HSR system should remain voluntary or move toward mandatory implementation in future, clearer calculation and algorithm guidance, consistent requirements across product categories, and an enforcement governance.  

The proposal may also trigger renewed discussions about consumer perceptions of the balance between simplified front-of-pack messaging and the understanding of healthier food choices.  

Submissions are due by the 21st of June, with FSANZ expected to consult with industry stakeholders, public health groups and government bodies as the proposal progresses. Food businesses should monitor updates closely and begin reviewing current HSR usage across product portfolios to identify any potential future compliance impacts. MSAC will be involved in the submission proposal process and encourages our community to have its say.  

According to the newly released data, FSANZ coordinated 92 food recalls in 2025, above the 10-year average of 87. Undeclared allergens remained the leading cause of food recalls, accounting for 38% of all food recalls in 2025.  

Undeclared allergens are continuing to dominate as the leading cause of recalls, accounting for 35 recalls in 2025. Milk, Wheat/Gluten, and Tree Nuts were the most commonly reported allergens, with many incidents linked to labelling and packaging errors. FSANZ reported that undeclared allergens have remained the primary recall driver for the past five years, with 197 allergen-related recalls recorded between 2021 and 2025.  

Microbial contamination and foreign matter were also major contributors to recalls, while mixed and processed foods remained the most frequently recalled product category.  

The data also provides insight into corrective actions being implemented by the industry. Between 2021 and 2025, the most common responses following recalls included staff training, amended handling procedures and updates to product labels and artwork.  

FSANZ noted that while rising recall numbers can indicate emerging supply chain or manufacturing issues, they also reflect stronger detection systems, improved internal testing and increased regulatory oversight. Many recalls are initiated proactively by businesses following internal monitoring, retailer feedback or consumer complaints.  

For manufacturers, importers and retailers, the latest figures reinforce the need for vigorous artwork review processes, allergen verification controls and ongoing supplier management. FSANZ continues to remind businesses that recall plans are mandatory and should be regularly reviewed to ensure rapid response capability if an issue arises.  

The latest recall statistics also come amid broader regulatory activity within the Australian food sector, including ongoing reviews of labelling requirements, nutrition information and food regulation systems, exactly what MSAC is here for! 

The renewed scheme, which initially launched as a pilot across five Victorian stores in early 2024, now allows customers to return clean and dry household soft plastics, including bread bags, chip packets, frozen food packaging and cereal liners, through dedicated collection bins located at participating stores.  

According to Woolworths, approximately 40 million pieces of soft plastic packaging, equivalent to more than 310,000 kilograms, have already been collected and processed through the program. The retailer says collected materials are being converted into products, including in-store wall panelling, building materials and selected Woolworths own-brand bread bags containing 30 per cent recycled plastic.  

The program is being supported by Australian recycling partners with Woolworths also collaborating through Soft Plastics Stewardship Australia (SPSA), alongside major brands such as Mars and Nestlé to help rebuild Australia’s soft plastics recycling infrastructure.  

The relaunch follows significant scrutiny of Australia’s soft plastics recycling system after the collapse of REDcycle left thousands of tonnes of material stockpiled nationally. Since then, regulators and industry have worked to restore consumer confidence while expanding local processing capacity and improving transparency across the recycling supply chain.  

For food and packaging businesses, the expanded collection network signals increasing industry momentum towards circular packaging systems and recycled-content packaging outcomes. It also reinforces the growing importance of Australasian Recycling Label (ARL) guidance, stewardship participation and design-for-recyclability considerations as retailers continue investing in packaging recovery initiatives. 

The Marine Stewardship Council (MSC) confirmed that Coles, Woolworths and ALDI have now transitioned 100% of their own-brand canned tuna ranges to MSC-certified sources, meaning millions of Australian shoppers are now purchasing tuna sourced from independently certified sustainable fisheries by default.  

The change has rapidly transformed the Australian canned seafood category. According to MSC data, around 70% of canned tuna sold nationally is now sourced from MSC-certified fisheries, while the number of MSC-labelled tuna products on Australian shelves has grown from 128 products in 2025 to more than 220 products in 2026.  

The shift began accelerating after Coles announced in 2024 that all Own Brand canned tuna products would transition to MSC certification. At the time, Coles described the move as a major step toward providing customers with independently verified sustainable seafood choices.  

ALDI followed with the rollout of MSC-certified tuna across its ranges, while Woolworths has also transitioned its home brand products to MSC-certified supply chains.  

The MSC blue fish tick has become increasingly prominent on supermarket shelves as retailers respond to growing consumer awareness around seafood sustainability, traceability and responsible sourcing. The certification program assesses fisheries against environmental standards including fish stock health, ecosystem impacts and effective fisheries management.  

Globally, more than half of the world’s wild tuna catch now comes from MSC-certified fisheries, highlighting a broader international push toward sustainable seafood production. This media release, signals a major milestone for the seafood industry and demonstrates how sustainability certifications are increasingly moving into mainstream grocery categories. 

At MSAC, we can support your business with the management and coordination of sustainability certifications, from certification guidance and supplier engagement through to compliance reviews and ongoing management, our team works closely with you to navigate growing sustainability expectations and retailer requirements. 

The roadmap provides greater transparency, predictability, and strategic direction for the industry and regulators with a strategic focus on four core outcomes:

• Safe And Suitable Food – Formulated Supplementary Sports Foods
• Healthy Food Supply – Young Child Formula, Infant and Childhood Foods, Nutrient Reference Values
• Informed And Empowered Consumers – Health Star Ratings, E-commerce, Digital Labelling
• Thriving Food Economies – Nutritive Substances and Novel Foods, International Alignment Review

The roadmap projects will be staggered until the end of 2030, with work already starting on health star rating, child formula and digital labelling.

The roadmap has been developed through stakeholder engagement and collaboration with food regulation system partners. This approach reflects the shared responsibility for maintaining a trusted food regulation system. FSANZ will continue to engage transparently and collaboratively through the progression of projects.    

Within the proposal, FSANZ has addressed the current challenges being faced within the industry, where proposals will be addressed to assist the industry in addressing complex issues, including global food supply, disease in public health, growing technology innovations, shifting consumer expectations and environmental changes.

What does success look like in 2030, as proposed by FSANZ? To lower the rate of foodborne illness, support a healthier diet for the young population, empower consumers to access trusted and accessible information, and sustain a fast and innovative export industry. FSANZ will continue to monitor these metrics of systems working efficiently to ensure the delivery has a positive impact on the whole population.

With a pipeline of changes ahead, early preparation is key. We support businesses with practical, end-to-end food regulatory advice, from label reviews and HSR implementation through to reformulation and compliance strategies, helping you stay ahead of regulatory change and reduce risk.

P1056 is focused on strengthening caffeine labelling requirements. This includes clearer declarations of caffeine content and updates to advisory statements, particularly for vulnerable groups such as children, pregnant or breastfeeding individuals, and those sensitive to caffeine. The proposal recognises that caffeine is no longer limited to coffee and energy drinks, but is now present in an expanding category of products in a growing retail range.

For the industry, the proposal includes key changes, including when caffeine can be added to foods and limiting high concentrations of guarana extract. New labelling will apply to packaged beverages with high caffeine levels, including caffeine content per serve and advisory statements. Caffeine will be permitted in formulated supplementary sports foods within defined limits, and will prohibit the retail sale of caffeine as a food. Changes remain unchanged for cola products and energy drinks that presently require advisory statements.

The implications across product formulation, packaging, and compliance processes are in response to the increasingly high concentration and excessive caffeine intake in the population, to define safety boundaries and consumer choice. From the 1^st of April, food ministers now have 60 days to consider the decision before the proposal is gazetted into the code. Food businesses will have 2 years from the date of gazettal to implement the changes.

Brands should start reviewing their products to identify products containing added caffeine and assess whether current labelling aligns with potential future requirements. Early engagement will be key to minimising reformulation or relabelling risks down the line.

Intensifying fuel costs, manufacturing pressure and disrupted transport are being passed through the supply chain, with delivery costs jumping significantly. Particularly as fuel-driven costs underpin nearly every stage of the food system, the uncertainty of the direction the political climate is taking is being seen across the industry. This uncertainty is driving behavioural shifts, including early signs of panic buying and stockpiling, further destabilising supply with demand.

Rising freight costs have driven up packaging expenses, specifically for plastic jars, films, bottles, and tubes, for buyers in the food, beverage and personal goods sectors. Plastic packaging relies heavily on oil-derived inputs, and disruptions to Middle Eastern supply chains are constraining access to key petrochemicals. This is pushing up the cost of packaging materials globally, with Australian manufacturers already warning of reduced availability and rising input costs. This can lead to increased product pricing and a decrease in the availability of certain materials.

The current global crisis is trickling down to conversations for packaging producers who fail to recycle. Australia is again considering a levy on plastic packaging, designed to incentivise recyclability and reduce reliance on virgin materials. However, the timing is notable, as introducing additional cost signals into a system already under pressure from fuel and material shortages raises the key questions of whether businesses are equipped to transition packaging formats under current supply constraints.

Right now, businesses need support, security and trust in an industry under pressure. MSAC is here to assist you in navigating change and keeping you informed with the most up-to-date requirements and updates your business needs.

The partnership is focused on fixing the current fragmentation between the national soft plastics collection and APCO’s recycling scheme infrastructure. SPSA will continue to lead the expansion of collection and recycling pathways, while APCO will embed the scheme into its established systems, including reporting, guidance and labelling frameworks, such as the Australasian Recycling Label Program. 

The collaboration is determined for a circular environment, focusing on reducing duplication, improving data integrity, and creating a more seamless participation model for the industry. For brand owners and retailers, that means clearer pathways to engage, more consistent reporting requirements, and stronger alignment between packaging design, labelling and end-of-life outcomes. 

Importantly, this alignment comes at a critical time. Following the collapse of REDcycle and ongoing scrutiny of soft plastics recycling, the industry has been under pressure to rebuild trust and demonstrate credible, workable solutions. The SPSA scheme, backed by the ACCC, aims to shift responsibility upstream and scale national capability. 

A more integrated stewardship ecosystem is emerging, with one that links packaging design decisions directly with collection infrastructure and recycling outcomes, signalling a future where packaging claims, recyclability statements and design choices will be in a capable system.

A greater expectation on businesses to align packaging, labelling and compliance with a system that is finally starting to take shape. If you’re navigating what this means for your packaging claims, recyclability labelling or upcoming artwork updates, now is the time to get ahead. We help businesses translate evolving stewardship frameworks into compliant, commercially workable labelling solutions.

This case highlights an important consideration for food manufacturers and retailers: it’s not just the ingredients present in a product, but the role they play in the formulation that determines whether a claim can be made and substantiated. Many food additives can serve multiple functions depending on how they are used in a formulation. When claims such as “No Preservatives” or “No Added Preservatives” or “Preservative Free” are made, businesses must ensure that none of the ingredients perform a preservative function within the final product.

With consumers increasingly seeking clean-label products—commonly understood as products made with simpler, fewer and easily recognisable ingredients, with minimal additives and greater transparency—front-of-pack claims such as “No Preservatives” play a significant role in purchasing decisions. As a result, inaccurate or unsupported claims can expose businesses to regulatory scrutiny, legal action and reputational damage.

To mitigate these risks, businesses should conduct thorough formulation assessments, ingredient function reviews – accurately declaring any additives as required under Food Standard Code – and carry out documentation checks supported by credible PIFs and technical substantiation.

Our team at MSAC Solutions can assist with documentation reviews, ingredient functionality assessments and claims verification to help ensure product claims are properly substantiated and compliant.